Drag the slider on each project to compare. Each entry lists the scope, the method, and the outcome — the same three things we put in front of an adjuster.
BeforeAfter
↔
Mold remediation — Piedmont NC
Crawlspace joists and subfloor sheathing
Scope
1,850 sq ft vented crawlspace, condensation-driven growth on joists, band boards, and subfloor decking.
Method
Containment and HEPA negative air, dry ice source removal at documented pressure, HEPA vacuum of horizontal surfaces, then handoff to the encapsulation and dehumidification trade.
Outcome
Two-day blast window with no dry-down period. Third-party clearance passed on first test.
Attic and second-floor framing with char layer and heavy soot loading on studs, rafters, and sheathing after a contained structure fire.
Method
Non-salvageable materials removed first, then dry ice stripped the charred cell layer and embedded soot from all salvageable structure. No rinse water introduced.
Outcome
Odor source removed rather than sealed. Rebuild started immediately with no drying hold, and the scope avoided a full framing tear-out.
Baked-on product, grease, and carbon buildup on conveyor rollers, rails, guarding, and adjacent frame in an active production plant.
Method
Cleaned in place during a scheduled sanitation window with food-grade CO2, CO2 monitoring, and forced ventilation. No disassembly, no rinse water, no grit.
Outcome
Line returned to production the same shift with no dry-down and no wastewater to capture or treat.
Images are representative of typical conditions and results for these project types. Client sites are photographed under confidentiality; project-specific documentation is available on request during scoping.
